2016_PriyaLasya_Reports A_2017_PriyaLasya_Reports Abhignyana_Sakuntalam_Apr17 About A_Guru_Constructs_You Amrita_Kuchipudi_Jan16 Ananya_Nruthyollasa_Sep2015 AntarYatra_July2016_BGL Aparna_Kuchipudi_Nov15 Ashrita_Kuchipudi_July2015 Ashrita_Nov18 Award_Divya_VMA_Nov2015 Bhamakalapam_Sibhiram_Nov18 Bharat_Kalanjali_2018 BN_Kiranmayee_Report_Oct16 Datta_Darshanam_TX_Apr16 Devanshi_Arangetram_July17 Divya_Kuchipudi_Feb17 Divya_Performance_Oct2015 Evening_Of_Kuchipudi_Feb16 Hemali_Rangapravesam_Jul17 Janaki_Rangarajan_SA_Mar16 Jwala_Arangetram_Aug2015 Kala_Samarpan_Dec16 Kavya_Smrithi_Jan17 Keiko_Kuchipudi_Jan16 KPF_GuruVandanam_Sep17 KPF_Sevasadan_Oct16 Kumarasambhavam_Aug2015 Maanasi_Rangapravesam_Jan17 Mahima_Arangetram_July17 Manasa_Rangapravesh_Sep2015 Manjari_A_Preview_Nov15 Medha_Arangetram_18July2015 Medha_Arangetram_July2015 Mohiniyattam_UP_Oct2015 Mridusmita_Das_YuvaPuraskar Natya_Parampara_2018 Natya_Parampara_Nov17 Pancha_Kanya_July2016 PanchaNayika_Feb16 PankajCharanDas_Award_2015 Poulasya_Charitam_July18 Report_Trayee_Aug2015 Samagati_Preview_Sep2015 Samviksana_Oct2015_Report Sarvani_Margazhi_Feb18 Shraddha_BN_YB_Feb16 Shruti_Parthasarathy Sindhuja_Kuchipudi_Jan16 Sindhuja_Kuchipudi_Mar16 Sneha_Arangetram_July18 Sookshma_Odissi_Apr16 Sreya_Arangetram_25July2015 Sri_Krishna_Parijatham_KAA Srividya_Hyderabad_Oct16 Sumana_Oct2015_Report Sundarakandam_Report_2015 Swara_And_Musical_Note_2015 Tanya_Feb16_BN_Report Tribhanga_Preview_July2016 Uday_Shenkar_Report_Nov15 Uma_Kuchipudi_Dec15 Vishaka_RangaPravesam_Jun18 |
Pic Source: Internet Bharatanatyam Performance - Shruti Parthasarathy. Disciple of Smt Medha Hari. Bharathiya Vidya Bhavan Auditorium, Chennai. Review by Naveena What do you do when the auditorium you are dancing in throws-up a power-failure in your very first item? If ‘remain unperturbed and continue’ was your response, you are cut from the same cloth as Kum. Shruti Parthasarathy, promising US-based young dancer, disciple of Smt. Medha Hari. Shruti danced to a live orchestra and performed the choreographies of her grand-guru, Smt. Anitha Guha, who was also present in the Bharathiya Vidya Bhavan Auditorium, [Chennai] on Aug 19th, where the recital was staged. The opening item was announced as ‘Thodaya mangalam’ in Ragamalika and Talamalika. This proved to be a festoon of opening lines of various compositions, including the popular ‘Sharanu sharanu surendra-sannutha’ of Annamacharya. Shruti despite being petite and waif-like managed to cover the large stage effortlessly. Her costume was tasteful no doubt, but the unattended strings and tassels that accompanied her attire literally proved to be ‘loose ends that need tying-up’— a distraction! The central piece was the Varnam, ‘Kolamayil vaahanane’ of Sri. Madurai N. Krishnan, set to Shanmukhapriya & Adi Talam. Shruti’s technique is well-honed and her performance was quite impressive. But as the saying goes, ’the devil is in the details’. Her one-legged stance at the very commencement of the Varnam was shaky and could have been pruned. Some movements seemed a little awkward, like when she turned around with one foot steady. Also, Abhinaya is one area that warrants attention, where Shruti is concerned. A dancer maintaining an almost-uniform expression cannot engage the connoisseur sustainedly. A great degree of involvement alone can draw the audience into the moment. This is perhaps what demarcates the good performer and great performer. Case-in-point: Shruti’s expressions and gaze were the same for Valli and Subrahmanya, when the Valli Kalyanam episode was portrayed. Valli displayed no wonder or coyness at the sight of the old man morphing into her Lord, nor did the Lord Himself display charming assurance. Similar was the case of the devotee and the Lord who was being extolled. One would want to see devotional fervour and awe in the case of the devotee, and benevolence in the Lord. But these were conspicuous by their absence. Granted, that Shruti is young and it would be unfair to expect too much from her. But the time is ripe to make a start—to know and to grow. Post-charanam in the same item, for the swara passages, the dancer landed on her feet with a jump, almost every time, with her hands on her waist, akin to little Krishna jumping down after partaking of butter in a lofty pot. This somehow did not behove the sedate Subrahmanya, who was being panegyrised as the granter of knowledge of the sacred Pranava. Of course, this is an issue with the choreography and the dancer cannot be faulted for merely executing it implicitly. Yours truly could not stay for the remainder of the programme owing to a social commitment. The orchestra was marked by the confident sollukattu of Medha Hari(Nattuvangam) and the sensitive cross-rhythms of Ramshankar Babu(Mridangam). Vocal was by Nandini Anand, who tried to give her best shot. One wished violinists such as K.P. Nandini possess a little more sensitivity towards the needs of not only the dance, but also that of the vocalist. (Naveena holds an M.B.A. in Human Resource, as well as an M.A. in Samskrtam. She enjoys wearing many hats: that of an arts-writer, speaker, translator, editor, linguist, singer, quizzer and compere.) Disclaimer: All the views expressed are exclusively that of the writer. Key words: Bharatanatyam Performance, Bharathiya Vidya Bhavan Auditorium, Chennai, Shruti Parthasarathy, Chennai September 2017, 0917-2-R1 **A Worldwide Indian Classical Dance Report ******* |